Visit our Re-post guidelines
Unveiling the truth behind global censorship: How the elite are silencing natural health advocates and controlling the narrative
- Coordinated Censorship: New evidence reveals a global effort by governments, Big Pharma, and Big Tech to suppress alternative health platforms like GreenMedInfo.
- Digital Deplatforming: GreenMedInfo faced deplatforming after over a decade of compliance, equating to a "digital book burning" of natural health content.
- Government Involvement: Documents from the UK Foreign Office and America First Legal expose international strategies for managing disinformation narratives that align with corporate interests.
- A Global Battle: This censorship campaign highlights the dangerous intersection of public health policy, free speech suppression, and the control of information in the digital age.
In the age of information warfare, disinformation has become a buzzword synonymous with online regulation, censorship, and speech suppression. Alternative health platforms such as GreenMedInfo have been targeted as key purveyors of what the global elite define as disinformation. New evidence, revealed through a combination of public reports, investigative articles, and government disclosures, has validated claims of a coordinated international effort to suppress specific actors who promote narratives that diverge from mainstream healthcare.
This article explores the implications of this global censorship campaign in light of recent findings from America First Legal (AFL), revelations from the UK Foreign Office, and investigations by GreenMedInfo itself. These sources expose a web of international influence, involving government agencies, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and global elites, all working to stifle alternative health voices under the guise of combatting disinformation.
The Rise of the Global Disinformation Campaign
Disinformation, as defined by the mainstream media and political institutions, is false or misleading information spread deliberately to deceive. However, what constitutes disinformation is increasingly a matter of interpretation. Platforms like GreenMedInfo, which promote natural remedies and challenge pharmaceutical-driven healthcare models, have found themselves labeled as disinformation actors despite being grounded in science and open access to peer-reviewed studies. According to Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMedInfo, the site's mission is to provide free access to research on natural medicine, making it a target for those wishing to control the narrative around public health.
In recent years, Ji and other alternative health advocates have faced increasing pressure. Their platforms have been deplatformed, defunded, and defamed as part of a concerted effort to stifle dissent. In an article titled "Exposé: Global Elite Target GreenMedInfo & Health Sites - Institute for Strategic Dialogue (C2)", Ji outlines how organizations like the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) are at the forefront of these attacks, operating under the pretense of combatting disinformation.In this article, Ji refers to ISD as "a think-tank linked to government and corporate interests that have painted dissenting voices in alternative health as dangerous." This tactic, Ji argues, effectively criminalizes platforms that offer perspectives on health, personal sovereignty, and natural healing--content that challenges the pharma-industrial complex. The target audience of ISD and similar organizations are tech giants such as Facebook, Twitter, and Google, which then adjust their algorithms and terms of service to comply with these global disinformation campaigns. Ji points out that these corporations have worked in tandem with ISD to systematically deplatform and censor GreenMedInfo.
From Targeting to Deplatforming: The Digital Burning of GreenMedInfo
The censorship experienced by GreenMedInfo reached a peak in what Sayer Ji refers to as the "Digital Burning of GreenMedInfo." In an article of the same title, Ji recounts how, after more than a decade of compliance, platforms like Mailchimp and Facebook abruptly severed ties with GreenMedInfo, removing its ability to reach millions of followers overnight. The deplatforming was particularly alarming given that GreenMedInfo had followed community guidelines for years without issue.
Ji describes this event as akin to a "digital book burning," where alternative viewpoints, particularly those advocating natural health and non-pharmaceutical solutions, were erased from the public sphere. In the article, Ji outlines how this censorship was part of a coordinated effort by Big Pharma, Big Tech, and government elites to suppress information that challenged mainstream narratives on health and medicine.
These coordinated actions, Ji argues, were not isolated incidents. They were part of a larger, international agenda to suppress free speech, particularly around health topics that challenge the status quo. According to Ji, this agenda is driven by corporate interests, who have much to gain from discrediting natural health platforms in favor of pharmaceutical solutions that generate significant revenue.
Revelations from the UK Foreign Office and America First Legal
The claims made by Sayer Ji have gained newfound credibility following the release of internal documents from the UK Foreign Office and America First Legal (AFL). On August 10, 2021, the Biden-Harris administration attended a masterclass on disinformation presented by the UK Foreign Office, where strategies for suppressing online content were discussed. These documents, revealed through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, shed light on the depth of international collaboration in managing disinformation narratives.
The UK Foreign Office Disinfo briefing slides outline a multinational effort involving the UK, US, Canada, Australia, and other nations, where intelligence is shared and coalitions are built to combat disinformation. However, what is particularly concerning is the definition of disinformation used by these governments, which encompasses not only demonstrably false information but also content that deviates from the official narratives set by pharmaceutical companies and government health agencies.
According to the slides, platforms like GreenMedInfo would easily fall under the disinformation umbrella, simply for promoting alternative health remedies that question pharmaceutical solutions. This confirmation of government involvement in censoring speech, particularly when aligned with corporate interests, underscores what Ji and other alternative health advocates have long suspected: government-corporate collusion is at the heart of the global disinformation campaign.
Furthermore, AFL's press release on newly obtained CDC documents reveals foreign influence in the Biden administration's censorship regime. The documents suggest that US government policies on disinformation are not purely domestic but are part of a global strategy to criminalize free speech. These revelations point to an extensive foreign collusion between governments, tech companies, and global organizations like the G7 Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM) and the Hybrid Center of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats (Hybrid CoE).
Coordinating a Global Narrative: The Role of ISD, G7, and Other Multinational Entities
The involvement of organizations like ISD in shaping global narratives around disinformation cannot be understated. ISD, in collaboration with government agencies and multinational corporations, has been instrumental in developing a global framework for defining and policing disinformation. This framework has increasingly targeted voices in the alternative health space, labeling them as dangerous actors responsible for spreading false information that could harm public health.
The UK Foreign Office and CDC documents illustrate that these multinational efforts involve a high degree of coordination. The G7 Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM), for example, is tasked with quickly addressing disinformation campaigns, particularly those that challenge the mainstream health narrative. Additionally, the Hybrid CoE provides intelligence and strategic advice on countering hybrid threats, which include online dissent and alternative viewpoints.
GreenMedInfo's coverage of these developments highlights how multinational bodies like the G7 RRM work in tandem with corporate and government interests to suppress dissenting viewpoints. In the article "Breaking: International Governments Are Criminalizing Free Speech Through Global Coordination," GreenMedInfo provides evidence of how governments are enacting policies that criminalize speech under the guise of protecting public health. The article goes on to describe how these measures infringe upon the constitutional rights of US citizens, particularly their First Amendment right to free speech.
In this broader context, Sayer Ji's platform is seen not as a rogue actor spreading harmful misinformation but as a victim of a concerted, international effort to stifle speech and control the public's access to information about their health. The global coordination revealed in these documents is indicative of a far-reaching conspiracy, involving multiple governments, that transcends national borders and seeks to standardize censorship across the world.
Implications for Free Speech and Public Health
The implications of these findings are staggering. If governments can collude with multinational corporations to suppress speech in one area, what's to stop them from expanding these efforts into other sectors? The criminalization of free speech under the guise of combatting disinformation sets a dangerous precedent, one where dissenting voices can be silenced without recourse.
For GreenMedInfo and other platforms that advocate for alternative health, the stakes could not be higher. Sayer Ji has long argued that public access to natural medicine and peer-reviewed research is essential for making informed health decisions. However, as these new revelations indicate, the very foundation of that freedom is under threat. The global coordination to censor platforms like GreenMedInfo is not just an attack on alternative health; it is an attack on the right to free speech and access to information.
Moreover, the documents suggest that the disinformation narrative is being used as a tool of control, wielded by those with vested interests in maintaining the status quo. Big Pharma, Big Tech, and global elites all stand to benefit from the suppression of alternative health narratives, as their solutions--namely, pharmaceuticals--remain the dominant response to global health crises.
Conclusion: A Global Battle for Control
In light of these new findings, it is clear that the battle over disinformation is much more than a domestic issue; it is a global struggle for control over public discourse. The targeting of GreenMedInfo and other alternative health platforms is part of a larger, orchestrated campaign to ensure that dissenting voices are silenced and that corporate interests continue to dictate health policies.
The revelations from America First Legal, the UK Foreign Office, and other investigative sources have validated what Sayer Ji and others have been warning about for years.
Conclusion: A Global Battle for Control
In light of these new findings, it is clear that the battle over disinformation is much more than a domestic issue; it is a global struggle for control over public discourse. The targeting of GreenMedInfo and other alternative health platforms is part of a larger, orchestrated campaign to ensure that dissenting voices are silenced and that corporate interests continue to dictate health policies.
The revelations from America First Legal, the UK Foreign Office, and other investigative sources have validated what Sayer Ji and others have been warning about for years. The global disinformation campaign, masked as a necessary public health measure, is in reality an effort to consolidate control over which narratives are allowed in the public domain. The intertwining of Big Pharma, Big Tech, and government entities in these efforts demonstrates how power structures can be leveraged to suppress speech that threatens entrenched interests.
For those who advocate for alternative medicine, like GreenMedInfo, the fight is not just about health but about the right to speak freely and access information that may not align with the dominant, profit-driven health paradigm. The coordinated, international nature of the censorship regime described in the newly released documents illustrates the lengths to which these power players will go to maintain control over the narrative.
As these global efforts intensify, the implications for free speech, personal autonomy, and public access to health information are dire. The struggle to maintain platforms like GreenMedInfo, which offer alternative perspectives on health, is not just a matter of protecting individual voices--it is a defense of the very principles upon which free and open societies are built.
References
1. GreenMedInfo, "Exposé: Global Elite Target GreenMedInfo & Health Sites - Institute for Strategic Dialogue (C2)," GreenMedInfo, accessed September 20, 2024, https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/
2. GreenMedInfo, "Digital Burning of GreenMedInfo: How Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Global Elites Silence Natural Medicine," GreenMedInfo, accessed September 20, 2024, https://greenmedinfo.com/
3. UK Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office, UK Disinfo IPC Briefing Slides, August 10, 2021, https://media.aflegal.org/wp-
4. America First Legal, "Exclusive: America First Legal Obtains New Internal CDC Documents Revealing Foreign Collusion in Biden-Harris Government Censorship Regime," AFL, September 2024, https://aflegal.org/exclusive-
5. GreenMedInfo, "Breaking: International Governments Are Criminalizing Free Speech Through Global Coordination," GreenMedInfo, September 2024, https://greenmedinfo.com/
Disqus